Two Democratic lawmakers want to stop high earners with more than $10 million in retirement accounts from adding more, targeting the largest tax breaks on the books.
Back
Democratic Bill Caps Retirement Tax Breaks Above $10 Million
Sen. Ron Wyden and Rep. Richard Neal proposed a bill barring high earners with more than $10 million in retirement accounts from further IRA contributions, targeting tax breaks worth $249.6 billion in uncollected revenue.
Tax breaks for IRAs and 401(k)-style plans are among the largest on the government's books, amounting to about $249.6 billion in revenue the U.S. did not collect in 2025, according to the nonpartisan congressional Joint Committee on Taxation.
The bill would apply to individuals with modified adjusted gross income above $400,000 and married couples above $450,000 with account balances over $10 million. Those affected would have to withdraw half of their balance above $10 million annually and pay taxes due — a $12 million saver would face a $1 million payout and a federal tax bill of about $370,000 if the money came from a traditional account. Balances above $20 million in Roth accounts would be withdrawn in full, so a $100 million Roth IRA would require an $80 million distribution.
The legislation faces long odds in a Republican-controlled Congress, but it marks a priority if Democrats take control in November. Wyden and Neal, the party's top tax-law writers, would become chairmen of the Senate Finance Committee and House Ways and Means Committee, which have jurisdiction over federal tax laws.
A Decade of Attempts to Cap Account Sizes
Wyden and Neal have proposed similar legislation before, and Presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama included measures to restrict account sizes in budget proposals that were never enacted. Under Biden, Democrats also sought to limit retirement accounts by banning them from holding unregistered securities, including private equity. Under President Trump, the Labor Department has proposed a regulation designed to make it easier for employers to offer workers access to investments in privately held companies through workplace plans.
The proposal follows a Wall Street Journal article that identified startup founders and Silicon Valley insiders who built multimillion-dollar retirement balances by investing in companies like Roblox and Nvidia before they went public. Those gains, generated inside tax-advantaged accounts, are the target of the new measure.
Most Savers Sit Far Below the Threshold
The bill's narrow scope means most Americans are unaffected. Average traditional IRA balances were $225,413 and Roth IRA balances $57,450 as of year-end 2023, according to the latest IRS Statistics of Income data released in June 2026. Even the wealthiest age cohorts hold far less than the $10 million threshold — savers in their 70s hold an average $334,461 in traditional IRAs and $134,039 in Roth IRAs.
The gap between the threshold and typical balances is wide across every age group. Savers in their 50s hold an average $149,406 in traditional IRAs and $54,572 in Roth IRAs, while those in their 60s average $289,052 and $72,027 respectively, per IRS data. Median balances are lower still — Empower data shows savers in their 60s hold a median $262,614 in traditional IRAs and $61,221 in Roth IRAs.
For 2026, the combined IRA contribution limit is $7,500, with an additional $1,100 catch-up for those 50 and older, per the IRS. The proposal would take effect after 2033 if approved by Congress. Figures and rules cited here reflect the latest available data and should be verified against official announcements before acting.
If Democrats win majorities in November, Wyden and Neal would lead the tax-writing committees and could advance the measure. If Republicans retain control, the proposal is unlikely to move. High-balance savers may still want to monitor the policy path, given repeated attempts to restrict account sizes across administrations. For the broader market, the proposal's narrow applicability means minimal direct impact, but it highlights the ongoing political debate over how much tax-advantaged wealth individuals should be allowed to accumulate. The measure also reflects a broader Democratic push to redirect retirement tax incentives toward lower- and middle-income savers, a theme likely to resurface in any future tax overhaul.
This content is for informational reference only and does not constitute professional advice.
