NATO is trying to build a new security framework for the Middle East as the Iran war threatens to create a long-term global energy crisis.
NATO is trying to build a new security framework for the Middle East as the Iran war threatens to create a long-term global energy crisis.

NATO plans to invite four key Gulf Arab states to its July summit in Ankara, a move aimed at building a new security framework as the war in Iran and the crisis in the Strait of Hormuz threaten to create a long-term global energy crisis.
"True peace cannot be built with a literature of humiliation, threats, and coercive score-settling," Kazem Gharibabadi, Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister for Legal and International Affairs, said on Tuesday, signaling Tehran's resolve as the conflict's costs mount.
The invitation to Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates comes as oil prices surge on fears of prolonged supply disruptions. US oil prices pushed toward $104 per barrel, up about 17 percent from last week's lows, while the International Energy Agency warned that global oil supply could fall by 3.9 million barrels per day by 2026. The disruption has already seen Europe's jet fuel imports from the Middle East collapse to just 60,000 barrels per day in April from 330,000 in March.
At stake is the stability of the global energy supply, which relies heavily on the Strait of Hormuz. Analysts believe NATO's outreach reflects an attempt to create a coordinated structure to manage the risk of the waterway becoming semi-permanently blockaded. The effort, however, is complicated by deep strategic divisions both within the Western alliance and among the Gulf nations themselves.
The Hormuz crisis has starkly highlighted a growing rift between the United States and its European allies. The Trump administration has been pressuring European nations to join its "Project Freedom" naval mission to escort commercial vessels, but countries like Germany, Spain, and Italy have resisted, fearing entanglement in a direct military conflict with Iran.
This friction was underscored by recent US decisions to withdraw troops from Germany, a move widely seen as a pressure tactic by President Trump to compel European allies to increase their own security spending and fall in line with Washington's harder stance on Iran. The conflict is also straining American finances, with the Pentagon's cost estimate for the war recently rising to $29 billion.
Complicating any unified response is the lack of consensus among the Gulf states. The United Arab Emirates has reportedly adopted a more aggressive posture, allegedly conducting secret military strikes against Iranian facilities. In contrast, nations like Saudi Arabia and Qatar have been more cautious, prioritizing diplomatic de-escalation to protect their economies from a full-blown regional war.
This divergence shows the challenge facing NATO in forging a coherent security partnership. While some Gulf nations may welcome stronger US and NATO backing to counter Iran, they also fear that fully aligning with the US could expose them to more direct and damaging retaliation from Tehran. The upcoming summit on July 7-8 will be a critical test of whether these disparate interests can be reconciled into a stable, long-term security architecture for the world's most vital energy corridor.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.