Netflix shares tumbled 17% in June, erasing roughly $67 billion in market value, as the streaming pioneer lost its co-founder and two acquisition bids in weeks.
Netflix shares tumbled 17% in June, erasing roughly $67 billion in market value, as the streaming pioneer lost its co-founder and two acquisition bids in weeks.

Netflix Inc. shares slid 17% in June to around $70, their worst monthly drop in two years, after co-founder Reed Hastings left the board and the company missed two acquisition targets.
"The market is pricing in a leadership vacuum at a time when Netflix needs to show it can still grow," said Michael Nathanson, senior media analyst at MoffettNathanson. "The failed M&A attempts add to the narrative that the company's next chapter is unclear."
The stock has now fallen 39.6% from its 52-week high of $134.12, with the decline accelerating through the second quarter. Netflix lost 21.3% over the past three months and another 6.8% in the last month alone. The 14-day relative strength index has slipped to 47.28 from above 70 in April, signaling momentum has shifted decisively lower. Trading volume during the June selloff ran above the 20-day average on multiple sessions as institutional investors reduced positions.
The selloff sets up a critical test on July 16, when Netflix reports second-quarter earnings. Analysts expect revenue of $12.6 billion and EPS of $0.79, representing 9.7% year-over-year growth. A strong report with raised guidance could reverse the slide; a miss risks confirming that the headwinds are structural, not cyclical.
Hastings, who co-founded Netflix in 1997 and built it into the world's largest streaming platform with 325 million subscribers, stepped down as chairman in June and left the board entirely on July 1. His departure removes the last founding influence from a company that has already transitioned through three distinct business models — DVD-by-mail, streaming licensing, and original content production.
The M&A setbacks compounded the uncertainty. Netflix lost the bidding war for Roku Inc. to Fox Corp., and earlier missed out on Warner Bros. Discovery, which was acquired by David Ellison's Paramount. The back-to-back deal failures raised questions about Netflix's strategic direction at a time when competitors are consolidating. The company did receive a $2.8 billion termination fee from the Warner Bros. deal, which boosted first-quarter operating income but masked rising content amortization costs.
Q1 Beat Masks Deeper Concerns
Netflix's first-quarter results, reported April 16, beat Wall Street estimates on both revenue and profit. Revenue rose 16.2% year-over-year to $12.25 billion, while EPS nearly doubled to $1.23 from $0.66. Operating cash flow almost doubled to $5.3 billion. The advertising business showed momentum, with 60% of new subscribers in ad-supported markets choosing the lower-priced tier and the advertiser base growing 70% year-over-year to more than 4,000 clients.
Yet the stock fell 9.7% after the release as investors focused on the full-year outlook. Management maintained its 2026 revenue guidance of $50.7 billion to $51.7 billion, implying 12% to 14% growth, and an operating margin target of roughly 31.5% — both below what some analysts had hoped for after the strong first quarter.
Valuation and the Path Forward
At 21.65 times forward earnings and 6.36 times sales, Netflix trades at a premium to the broader market but below its own historical averages. Wall Street remains broadly bullish: 31 of 49 analysts rate the stock a Strong Buy, with a mean price target of $113.55 implying 46.2% upside from current levels. The Street-high target of $135 suggests potential gains of 73.9%.
The bull case rests on the advertising business, which management expects to generate nearly $3 billion in revenue this year, and expansion into live sports and gaming. The bear case centers on content amortization costs, which are expected to peak in the second quarter, and the absence of Hastings' strategic vision. For the stock to reclaim its highs, Netflix needs to show that advertising can become a meaningful growth engine and that the M&A setbacks were tactical, not strategic.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.