A US military strike near Iran's border with Iraq has sent crude oil above $90 a barrel as traders price in the risk of a broader conflict that could disrupt the Strait of Hormuz.
A US strike near Piranshahr in Iran's West Azerbaijan province pushed Brent crude above $90 a barrel Monday, as traders priced in the risk of Tehran closing the Strait of Hormuz — a chokepoint handling 20% of global energy trade.
"The market is now pricing a non-trivial probability of a full Hormuz disruption, which would be an economic shock unlike anything since the 1973 oil embargo," said Helima Croft, head of global commodity strategy at RBC Capital Markets.
Brent crude rose $4.20 to $91.80 a barrel, the highest since April. Gold gained 1.8% to $2,485 an ounce as investors sought havens, while the S&P 500 fell 1.2%. The VIX, Wall Street's fear gauge, jumped to 24.6 from 18.3 on Friday.
Iran's West Azerbaijan province sits 200 miles from the Strait of Hormuz, where Iran has already demonstrated the ability to target commercial shipping. A full closure would remove about 21 million barrels of oil products from daily global supply, according to the US Energy Information Administration, potentially pushing crude above $120.
Iranian state media IRIB confirmed the strike near Piranshahr, a strategic city close to the Iraqi border, reporting damage to vehicles. The Civil Aviation Organization of Iran has not yet announced any airspace closure, though market pricing suggests traders see that as a growing possibility.
The attack marks a significant geographic expansion of the US-Iran conflict. Previous strikes had focused on Iran's nuclear facilities and coastal military installations, leaving its northwestern provinces largely untouched. The shift raises the stakes for neighboring countries: Iraq, Turkey, and the Caspian Sea states now face potential spillover.
Hormuz Bypass Plans Accelerate
The Strait of Hormuz has long been Iran's most potent economic weapon. Before the current conflict, about 23 million barrels of energy products passed through the waterway daily — the single chokepoint for exports from Iraq, Kuwait, Qatar, and Bahrain, and the main route for Saudi Arabia and the UAE.
Iran's strategy of targeting commercial shipping has already triggered a historic re-routing of energy infrastructure. Saudi Arabia is expanding its east-west pipeline to the Red Sea to 9 million barrels per day by 2029. The UAE is doubling its bypass capacity to 3.6 million barrels by 2027. Iraq is pursuing multiple western routes — through Syria to the Mediterranean, through Turkey to Ceyhan, and through Jordan to Aqaba — that together could add 4 million to 6.5 million barrels of daily capacity.
Goldman Sachs estimates these bypass projects could carry about 60% of the oil typically shipped through Hormuz by the end of 2028. But that timeline offers little comfort to markets facing an immediate supply threat.
A Merging Crisis in the Caspian
The Piranshahr strike also highlights a broader strategic shift: the wars in Ukraine and Iran are converging in the Caspian Sea region. Russia has provided Iran with intelligence to help Tehran strike US military positions, according to AP sources, while the Kremlin's own conflict in Ukraine has redrawn energy routes across the Black Sea and Central Asia.
For President Donald Trump, the merging of these two fronts creates a dilemma. The US is simultaneously trying to contain Iran's Hormuz threat, support Ukraine's energy infrastructure, and prevent a broader Caspian conflict — all while managing domestic gasoline prices ahead of an election cycle.
The last time Iran faced a direct strike on its northwestern territory was during the 1980-88 Iran-Iraq war, when Baghdad's attacks on Khuzestan and Kurdish regions prompted Tehran to expand the conflict into the Persian Gulf. That eight-year war ended with no territorial changes but devastated both economies. Today, the stakes are higher: Iran's nuclear program, its proxy networks across four countries, and the global energy system are all at risk.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.